Setting Up a Fund in DIFC vs ADGM: Key Differences Every Private Markets Manager Should Know
- Rachel Zlatar
- Dec 1, 2025
- 5 min read

When establishing a fund in the UAE, both DIFC and ADGM present compelling but distinct value propositions for private markets managers. Both jurisdictions offer 100% foreign ownership, robust regulatory frameworks, and a highly attractive 0% tax environment. However, the choice between them depends significantly on your fund's size, strategy, investor base, and regional focus.
The decision isn't just about regulatory differences: it's about positioning your fund within the GCC's evolving capital ecosystem. DIFC commands scale and connectivity. ADGM delivers innovation and agility. Understanding these distinctions shapes your fund's trajectory in the Middle East's $54.8 billion private markets landscape.
DIFC: The Established Capital Hub
DIFC operates under a mature, investor-focused regulatory framework administered by the Dubai Financial Services Authority (DFSA). The jurisdiction emphasises investor protection and market integrity, with guidelines that have evolved through two decades of experience. In 2024, DIFC's assets under management surged 58% to reach $700 billion, cementing its position as the region's largest financial centre.
Regulatory Framework
The DFSA takes a prescriptive approach to fund regulation. License categories are clearly defined, with specific requirements for each fund type. Investment managers must demonstrate robust governance structures, risk management frameworks, and compliance capabilities from day one. This creates higher barriers to entry but provides clearer regulatory certainty.
Fund structures include conventional hedge funds, private equity vehicles, real estate funds, and venture capital structures. Each category has defined minimum capital requirements, operational standards, and ongoing reporting obligations. The regulatory process typically takes 12-16 weeks for standard applications, though complex structures may require additional time.
Cost Structure
DIFC's fee structure reflects its premium positioning. Initial licence fees range from $50,000 to $100,000 depending on fund type and complexity. Annual supervision fees scale with assets under management, starting at $25,000 for smaller funds and increasing progressively. Office space requirements add $30,000-60,000 annually for compliant premises in the Centre.
Professional services costs are higher due to the mature ecosystem. Legal advisory for fund establishment ranges from $75,000-150,000 for standard structures. Compliance infrastructure, including systems and personnel, represents an ongoing commitment of $200,000-400,000 annually for mid-sized operations.
Strategic Advantages
DIFC's primary strength lies in its institutional connectivity. The Centre hosts the region's largest concentration of international banks, family offices, and institutional service providers. Fund managers gain access to established distribution channels and sophisticated investor bases through this network effect.
The jurisdiction's common law framework provides familiar legal territory for international managers. Court systems operate in English, with established precedent for commercial disputes. This legal certainty reduces structuring risks and enhances investor confidence in fund documentation.
For private equity managers targeting regional expansion, DIFC offers unparalleled access to the broader GCC market. The Centre's reputation with sovereign wealth funds and institutional allocators provides credibility that translates to capital raising advantages.

ADGM: The Innovation-Focused Alternative
ADGM positions itself as the UAE's innovation hub, with regulatory frameworks designed for agility and forward-thinking investment strategies. Administered by the Financial Services Regulatory Authority (FSRA), the jurisdiction recorded 226% growth in assets under management during H1 2024, with 141 funds managed by 112 asset managers.
Regulatory Approach
The FSRA employs a principles-based regulatory philosophy that emphasises outcomes over prescriptive rules. This creates flexibility for innovative fund structures and investment strategies. The authority's regulatory sandbox allows fund managers to test new approaches with relaxed requirements during pilot phases.
License categories mirror DIFC's offerings but with streamlined application processes. Standard fund manager licenses can be obtained in 8-12 weeks, with fast-track options for established managers. The regulator's digital-first approach reduces documentation requirements and accelerates approval timelines.
ADGM has pioneered cryptocurrency and digital asset frameworks within the GCC. Fund managers focusing on alternative investments, including digital assets, sustainable strategies, or innovative structures, find more receptive regulatory treatment.
Cost Considerations
ADGM's fee structure reflects its competitive positioning. Initial licence fees range from $30,000-75,000, approximately 25-30% lower than comparable DIFC structures. Annual supervision fees follow similar scaling but with reduced baseline costs for smaller funds.
Office space requirements are more flexible, with compliant premises available from $20,000-45,000 annually. The jurisdiction's newer infrastructure provides modern facilities at competitive rates compared to DIFC's premium locations.
Professional services costs benefit from ADGM's streamlined requirements. Legal advisory for standard fund structures ranges from $50,000-100,000. Ongoing compliance costs are typically 15-20% lower due to reduced reporting requirements and digital infrastructure capabilities.

Direct Comparison: Key Dimensions
Dimension | DIFC | ADGM |
Regulatory Authority | Dubai Financial Services Authority (DFSA) | Financial Services Regulatory Authority (FSRA) |
Regulatory Philosophy | Prescriptive, investor-protection focused | Principles-based, innovation-friendly |
Legal Framework | Common law with English law fallback | Direct English common law application |
Approval Timeline | 12-16 weeks | 8-12 weeks |
Initial Licence Fees | $50,000-100,000 | $30,000-75,000 |
Annual Office Costs | $30,000-60,000 | $20,000-45,000 |
AUM (2024) | $700 billion (+58% YoY) | +226% growth H1 2024 |
Professional Network | Extensive, mature ecosystem | Boutique, rapidly growing |
Digital Assets | Limited framework | Comprehensive crypto regulation |
Ideal Fund Size | $100 million+ | $25-200 million |
Strategic Considerations for Fund Managers
Investor Base Alignment
DIFC's established reputation resonates with traditional institutional investors. Pension funds, insurance companies, and conservative family offices often prefer the jurisdiction's mature regulatory framework and extensive professional infrastructure. Fund managers with global LP bases benefit from DIFC's international recognition.
ADGM appeals to more dynamic investor segments. Sovereign wealth funds based in Abu Dhabi maintain closer relationships with locally domiciled managers. The jurisdiction's innovation focus attracts forward-thinking allocators interested in emerging strategies and alternative asset classes.
Operational Efficiency
DIFC's comprehensive service provider ecosystem enables sophisticated fund operations. Prime brokerage, custody, administration, and compliance services are readily available from tier-one providers. This depth creates operational efficiency for complex strategies requiring multiple service relationships.
ADGM's streamlined approach suits fund managers prioritising agility over comprehensive service provision. The jurisdiction's digital infrastructure supports efficient operations, though service provider options remain more limited compared to DIFC's mature ecosystem.
Growth Trajectory Planning
Fund managers anticipating significant scale should consider DIFC's infrastructure advantages. The Centre's capacity to support multi-billion dollar operations and complex fund structures provides long-term growth accommodation.
Emerging managers or those testing innovative strategies may find ADGM's flexibility more suitable for initial phases. The jurisdiction's lower barriers to entry and regulatory agility support rapid iteration and strategy refinement.
Regional Market Positioning
The choice between DIFC and ADGM reflects broader positioning within the GCC capital markets ecosystem. DIFC managers often pursue pan-regional strategies, leveraging Dubai's role as the commercial hub connecting global capital with regional opportunities.
ADGM managers frequently focus on UAE-centric or Abu Dhabi-anchored strategies. The jurisdiction's proximity to sovereign wealth funds and government-related entities creates advantages for specific investment themes, particularly infrastructure, renewable energy, and strategic sectors aligned with UAE Vision 2071.
Recommendations by Strategy
Choose DIFC for:
Established fund managers with $100 million+ target fund sizes
Private equity strategies targeting regional expansion
Complex fund structures requiring sophisticated service providers
Global institutional investor bases prioritising regulatory certainty
Multi-strategy platforms requiring comprehensive operational infrastructure
Choose ADGM for:
Emerging fund managers testing innovative strategies
Digital asset or cryptocurrency-focused investment approaches
UAE-domiciled or Abu Dhabi-connected investor relationships
Cost-conscious operations prioritising regulatory flexibility
Sustainable investment strategies requiring responsive regulatory treatment
Both jurisdictions offer compelling advantages within their respective positioning. The optimal choice depends on aligning regulatory environment, cost structure, and strategic objectives with your fund's specific requirements and growth trajectory. Success in either jurisdiction ultimately depends on execution excellence and deep regional market understanding rather than jurisdictional selection alone.
The UAE's dual financial centre model provides sophisticated optionality for private markets managers. Leveraging this choice strategically positions your fund for sustainable growth within the Middle East's expanding alternative investment ecosystem.
